<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intranet Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intranetfocus.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com</link>
	<description>Strategy, Technology and Governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:55:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Research Notes from Intranet Focus Ltd &#8211; a new service for the intranet community</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/634</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/634#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is certainly a lot of information being published on intranets.  There are excellent reports  from Jane McConnell, James Robertson, Toby Ward and the Nielsen Norman Group, as well as the range of books and reports from the team at Step Two Designs. There are many very good intranet blogs , an increasing number of intranet-related conferences and the technology evaluation reports from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is certainly a lot of information being published on intranets.  There are excellent reports  from <a href="http://www.digital-workplace-trends.com/" target="_blank">Jane McConnell</a>, <a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/iia" target="_blank">James Robertson</a>, <a href="http://www.prescientdigital.com/SocialIntranet" target="_blank">Toby Ward</a> and the <a href="http://www.nngroup.com/reports/intranet/design/" target="_blank">Nielsen Norman Group</a>, as well as the range of books and reports from the team at <a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/products" target="_blank">Step Two Designs</a>. There are many very good <a href="http://www.intranetfocus.com/resources/blogs" target="_blank">intranet blogs </a>, an increasing number of <a href="http://www.intranetfocus.com/resources/conferences" target="_blank">intranet-related conferences</a> and the technology evaluation reports from the <a href="http://www.realstorygroup.com" target="_blank">Real Story Group</a>. Each year brings new intranet developments, often led by technology. Social intranets and mobile access are just two examples. Keeping track of these developments and trying to assess their implications is quite a challenge. The <a href="http://www.ibforum.com/services/research-2/" target="_blank">Intranet Benchmarking Forum</a> do undertake research projects, but many of the reseach reports are of course for IBF members only.  Others can be bought from the <a href="http://www.ibforum.com/ibf-shop/" target="_blank">IBF Shop</a>.</p>
<p>Over the last few years Intranet Focus Ltd has built up a substantial research collection of around 1000 reports and papers on all aspects of intranet management and information management, and over 100 books.  We also have access to the Digital Library of the Association for Computing Machinery, a repository of over 1 million research papers, reports and conference proceedings.  Most important of all we have the knowledge we have gained through the consulting projects that we undertake each year.</p>
<p>So this month we are launching a series of Research Notes. These will be published monthly, other than in July and August and will be written in a style that we hope intranet managers will find useful in discussions with other business managers about enhancing the scope and value of an intranet.   The topics will be based on the requirements we see emerging from our consulting work. Each of the Research Notes will be 10-15 pages long and will be published towards the end of the month. We are not going to publish a schedule of titles for the year as we want to reflect on what is important at the time we start to prepare the next Research Note. The first one to be published is on <a href="http://www.intranetfocus.com/resources/downloads" target="_blank">enterprise search team management</a>. You will see from the drop-down navigation bar for Resources there is now a section called Research Notes, and all the research can be downloaded as pdf files. If you would like to have any of the Research Notes as a Word file that you can use for internal purposes please contact us, but normally this format would only be available to our clients.</p>
<p>We can also prepare custom reports, either a tailored version of one of the Research Notes or specifically written for your organisation.  We would be pleased to give you a quotation for the work.</p>
<p>We would welcome feedback on the titles we publish, and it is highly likely that in the course of the year the format and approach of the Research Notes will evolve as we respond to your comments and suggestions.</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/634/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaboration Roadmap &#8211; a new book from Michael Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/619</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/619#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect that many SharePoint implementations are justified on the basis of improving collaboration, even though there is usually only at best anecdotal information about poor outcomes of collaborative working. Anecdotes usually form the basis of most books offering advice on collaboration, and the result that it is difficult to take advantage of the advice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that many SharePoint implementations are justified on the basis of improving collaboration, even though there is usually only at best anecdotal information about poor outcomes of collaborative working. Anecdotes usually form the basis of most books offering advice on collaboration, and the result that it is difficult to take advantage of the advice in your own organisation. This excellent book takes a different perspective. Michael Sampson’s latest book,  <a href="http://www.michaelsampson.net/collaborationroadmap.html" target="_blank">Collaboration Roadmap</a>,  comes with the strap line “You’ve got the technology – now what?” and is full of practical advice and (just as important) encouragement to do collaboration better. Michael has been studying the technology, business implications and cultural aspects of collaboration for nearly two decades, integrating information, experience and knowledge about effective collaboration into a book full of wisdom. Collaboration Roadmap will tell you all you need to know about how to get the best from the technology.</p>
<p>The sections of this 320 page book are</p>
<ul>
<li>Really understand the technology</li>
<li>Outline the vision</li>
<li>Accept technology is a small factor in success</li>
<li>Determine your governance approach</li>
<li>Make every effort to engage the business</li>
<li>Apply intentional energy to adoption</li>
<li>Pursue increasing value</li>
</ul>
<p>Although there is a substantial chapter of over 60 pages on technology the emphasis is on understanding what features are needed to support collaboration and how to evaluate the extent to which your current technology platform is able to deliver these features.  Michael has a great deal of experience of Microsoft and IBM collaboration technologies but the book is absolutely vendor neutral, and there is an emphasis on recognising and working within the capabilities of your current technology platform before making any arbitrary decision to change. I especially liked Chapter 6 on how to engage with the business, in which Michael sets out five hallmarks of engagement and then follows with seven engagement strategies, of which the first is lunch! I also like the way that Michael brings a large number of frameworks and models into play to help readers understand the fundamental principles of effective collaboration, and that he is very open about presenting the ideas of others who have looked in detail at the processes and problems of collaboration.</p>
<p>Michael has self-published this book but the production quality is higher than many commercial publishers achieve. The cover artwork alone will make you want to have this book on your desk to show that you (thanks to Michael) really do know how to get the best out of the teams you work on, or work with.  The book is full of charts and diagrams that will soon find their way onto a whiteboard in your office. At just $39 it is excellent value for money. Why not buy one for each of your team leaders and one for your CIO?</p>
<p>Michael runs superb workshops, so if you want to have a personal guide through the book why not come to his <a href="http://www.intranetfocus.com/resources/conferences" target="_blank">Collaboration Master Class</a> in London on 15 March?</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/619/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intranet Design Annuals  &#8211; Company index for 2009 &#8211; 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/610</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/610#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a list of companies and other organisations that have been profiled in the Nielsen Norman Group Intranet Design Annuals over the last four years. It may help you track down profiles of interest to your own organisation, either by sector or by country.  The reports are still available from the Nielsen Norman Group [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a list of companies and other organisations that have been profiled in the <a href="http://www.nngroup.com/reports/intranet/">Nielsen Norman Group Intranet Design Annuals</a> over the last four years. It may help you track down profiles of interest to your own organisation, either by sector or by country.  The reports are still available from the Nielsen Norman Group</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) (USA) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Altran (France) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">AMP Limited (Australia) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">BASF SE (Germany) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Bennett Jones LLP (Canada) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Bouygues Telecom (France) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">CenturyLink Business (US) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">COWI Group A/S, (Denmark) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Credit Suisse AG (Switzerland) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (DTT) (Global) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Duke Energy (US) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Enbridge, Inc. (Canada) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Environmental Resources Management (ERM) (Global) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Everything Everywhere (UK) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">GE (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Genentech (US) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Habitat for Humanity International (US) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Heineken International (The Netherlands) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">HSBC Bank Brazil (Brazil) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Huron Consulting Group (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Kaupthing Bank (Iceland) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Korean Telecom (Republic of Korea) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">L.L.Bean (USA) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">LivePerson, Inc (US) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Logica, (UK) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">MAN Diesel &amp; Turbo SE (Germany) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">McKesson Corporation (USA) 2009</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">MITRE Corporation, (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Mota-Engil Engenharia e Construção, S.A. (Portugal) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">NCR Corporation (US) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">SCANA Corp. (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Scotts Miracle-Gro (US) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Skanska (Sweden) 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Staples, Inc.(US)  2012</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Trend Micro, Inc. (Japan) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">URS Corporation (US) 2010</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Verizon Communications (US) 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Walmart) (US) 2010</span></p>
<p>Martin White</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/610/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intranet Design Annual 2012 &#8211; profiles of 10 excellent intranets</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/603</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/603#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The subtitle of this report is The Year’s Ten Best Intranets, but this report is more than just very detailed profiles of ten  intranets.  The NNGroup have been running this competition since 2001 and so can place trends and developments into a long term perspective. What marks out these profiles is that they are not written by journalists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subtitle of this report is The Year’s Ten Best Intranets, but this report is more than just very detailed profiles of ten  intranets.  The <a href="http://www.nngroup.com/reports/intranet/design/" target="_blank">NNGroup</a> have been running this competition since 2001 and so can place trends and developments into a long term perspective. What marks out these profiles is that they are not written by journalists but by NNGroup consultants Kara Pernice, Amy Shade and Patty Caya (together with Jakob Nielsen himself) who know both where to probe and where to highlight excellence in innovation and user-centric design.</p>
<p>This year the winners are</p>
<ul>
<li>CenturyLink Business (USA),</li>
<li>Everything Everywhere (UK),</li>
<li>Genentech (US),</li>
<li>LivePerson, Inc. (US),</li>
<li>Logica (UK),</li>
<li>MAN Diesel &amp; Turbo SE (Germany),</li>
<li>NCR Corporation (US),</li>
<li>Scotts Miracle-Gro (US)</li>
<li>Skanska (Sweden)</li>
<li>Staples, Inc. (US).</li>
</ul>
<p>This year many of the winners are somewhat smaller than in previous years. As the report notes, technology offerings might contribute to the success of these smaller winners because as a very long-term trend it&#8217;s getting easier to implement designs with good usability, bringing quality user experience within the reach of ever-smaller companies. One notable change has been the increase in size of intranet teams to around 1 per 1500 employees from a fairly steady level of 1 per 3000 employees for a number of years. This is a welcome commitment from the award winners, and probably a critical success factor in gaining this prestigious award.  What is slightly surprising is that none of the award winners has made much progress in support for mobile devices, but the reasons for this are well argued by the authors of the report.</p>
<p>As well as highlighting the reasons why these ten organisations won an award this year there is a list of 14 areas where many intranets are still failing to adopt good practice in design, content and usability. A good checklist for your own intranet that might help you make a business case for investment!</p>
<p>Each profile is around 30 pages long, with in total 187 screen shots.  Overall the production quality, attention to detail and value for money ($248 for 431 pages and ten profiles) makes this report a must-buy even for small organisations. As an intranet community we are indebted to the Nielsen Norman Group for the effort it devotes each year to this unique and invaluable publication.</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/603/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Digital Workplace – Redefining Productivity in the Information Age</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/593</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/593#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of discussion about what a digital workplace might look like, especially by intranet managers who are not sure whether to embrace the concept or to resist it.  Jane McConnell has come up with four digital workplace scenarios,  Paul Miller&#8217;s new book on this topic is due out in March and Mark Morrell has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of discussion about what a digital workplace might look like, especially by intranet managers who are not sure whether to embrace the concept or to resist it.  Jane McConnell has come up with four <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/NetStrategyJMC/digital-workplace-trends-2012" target="_blank">digital workplace scenarios</a>,  Paul Miller&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dwforum.com/the-dw-book/" target="_blank">new book</a> on this topic is due out in March and <a href="http://intranet-pioneer.com/" target="_blank">Mark Morrell </a>has been blogging on digital workplace issues for some time.</p>
<p>This excellent report by Stephan Schillerwein (<a href="http://www.infocentricresearch.com" target="_blank">Infocentric Research</a>) provides a complementary &#8216;information management&#8217; perspective and starts off with an analysis of the work that has been done on the impact of information on organisational performance. There is more evidence than most people realise.  In this opening section I loved the comment that employees are both expensive and bad search engines! The author then discusses what it will take to develop and implement a digital workplace, commenting that a digital workplace is not primarily an IT-system and it can only be effective when completely embedded into all aspects of an organization. This of course is only possible if fully backed by management and accompanied by substantial change management activities.</p>
<p>Much of the discussion about digital workplaces does not actually get into the detail of what such a workplace will offer, and that is one of the many aspects of this report that I liked a great deal. Whether I entirely agree with some of the proposed features is irrelevant, as the purpose of the report is to stimulate further discussion and experimentation.  There is an especially good section towards the end of the report about how to use a balanced scorecard approach to illustrate the value of information management. The only aspect missing from this report is a consideration of who should own information management and sponsor the development of digital workspaces.</p>
<p>Overall this is the best report I have seen so far on digital workplaces, and I would strongly recommend it to any organisation. The presentation is excellent, with some very good charts and diagrams, and I have already added some to my PowerPoint files, with an acknowledgement to Infocentric Research of course!</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Martin White</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/593/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Social Organisation &#8211; a new book from the Gartner Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/555</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/555#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tag line of this book, written by Gartner Inc. analysts Anthony J. Bradley and Mark P. McDonald,  is “how to use social media to tap the collective wisdom of your customers and employees”. At the JBoye Aarhus conference this year I was struck by an insight from Claire Flanagan (CSC) that you can’t plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tag line of this book, written by Gartner Inc. analysts Anthony J. Bradley and Mark P. McDonald,  is “how to use social media to tap the collective wisdom of your customers and employees”. At the JBoye Aarhus conference this year I was struck by an insight from <a href="http://aarhus11.jboye.com/speaker/claire-flanagan/" target="_blank">Claire Flanagan</a> (CSC) that you can’t plan to go viral with social media, but you can’t go viral without a plan. This book, published by <a href="http://hbr.org/product/the-social-organization-how-to-use-social-media-to/an/10536-HBK-ENG?N=4294841678&amp;Ns=publication_date|1&amp;Nao=10" target="_blank">Harvard Business Review Press</a>,  is about the process of planning. Too many books on social media are largely a collection of anecdotes about social media from the perspective of a particular company.  Here the authors are able to capitalise on the outcomes of client engagements with Gartner clients, and the benefits are quite substantial.</p>
<p>There are eleven chapters in this 200 page book, but to me the core of the book is around the development of a strategic approach to community collaboration that is set out in Chapter 5. I’ve seen too many companies rush headlong into social media just because everyone else is doing so, and then find it very difficult to assess the impacts and to build on the initial offerings.  The key message of this book is that it is important to target a specific group of participants, understand the nature or focus of their collaboration, understand what is in it for the participants and then consider what the value is to the organisation.</p>
<p>One of the methodologies suggested by the authors is a ‘purpose roadmap; that identifies the target community and how it may change over time. This roadmap then forms the basis of the rest of the book, which covers topics that include launching a community, guiding from the middle and adapting the organisation. The book includes a good glossary and a very good index.</p>
<p>This book takes a very sober view of social media and the development of social organisations, with a good balance between identifying the value and yet taking a realistic view of how much vision, time, resource and patience will need to be invested if there is to be a measurable impact on the organisation.  The writing style is also sober &#8211; it does read more like a Gartner report than a book. One  thing that did annoy me about the book is the way that every telephone conversation the authors had with their clients is listed out in the Notes section with a time and a date. Who cares? Very Gartner but of zero benefit to the reader!</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/555/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Workplace Trends 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/549</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/549#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of my career has been in the publishing business and on many occasions I have been faced with the problem of how to change a directory or report published on an annual basis into something that has renewed impact but maintains the quality and reputation of previous editions. It is not at all easy!  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of my career has been in the publishing business and on many occasions I have been faced with the problem of how to change a directory or report published on an annual basis into something that has renewed impact but maintains the quality and reputation of previous editions. It is not at all easy!  I have enormous respect for the way in which Jane McConnell has repositioned her Global Intranet Trends Report as the Digital Workplace Report and yet still ensured that key intranet trends identified in earlier reports are still presented and assessed . Released just before Christmas, once again there is a need carefully to read every one of the 140 pages of the report  to gain a true understanding of how intranets are evolving, and potentially morphing into digital workplaces.</p>
<p>The report has six main sections</p>
<ul>
<li>The Digital Workplace</li>
<li>The Managed Dimension</li>
<li>The Social Collaborative Dimension</li>
<li>The Mobile Dimension</li>
<li>Governance and Management</li>
<li>The Digital Workplace Tomorrow</li>
</ul>
<p>This year just over 450 organisations completed the survey, and as intranets mature the scatter of some of the earlier reports is now being replaced by a consensus of vision even if not yet a consensus of outcomes. The way in which Jane has presented the survey information makes it even easier to assimilate than in the past.  There is careful highlighting of the data supported by insights that are always a blend of survey outcomes, the text responses in the survey and Jane’s extensive consulting experience.</p>
<p>It is impossible to summarise the analysis in a short blog, so just a few comments will have to suffice</p>
<ul>
<li>I like the four scenarios for the future of the digital workplace, which should stimulate a lot of debate. The scenarios are given the short titles of &#8220;My apps&#8221;, &#8220;Smart systems&#8221;, &#8220;People centric&#8221; and Super search&#8221;. Jane highlights the fact that these are not four different scenarios, but represent different strategies and visions as digital workplaces evolve.</li>
<li>There is little improvement in search satisfaction over the last two years and 61% of respondents still have less than one member of staff allocated to search. The view that Jane has on digital workplaces is that they will attract the &#8220;best and brightest&#8221; people will be personalised, people-centric and powered by a super-search.  I support that vision, but how organisations with such a minimal investment in search are going to get there with the current lack of investment in search is quite a conundrum.</li>
<li>The section on mobile adoption is very timely, as much of the discussion in 2011 has been based on largely anecdotal information. Now we have quantitative information and that alone should justify the purchase of the report because what limited survey data there is tends to come from surveys of IT managers.</li>
</ul>
<p>It’s sad to see a page about senior management issues 16 years after the advent of intranets!</p>
<p>My only suggestion for improvement next year is to provide a shorter Executive Summary. Sadly few senior managers are going to read and respond to the six pages of analysis that provide such an excellent summary of the report. The NetStrategy/JMC survey is now the definitive survey of digital workplace adoption as well as for intranet development.  The report should be be shared with all the intranet stakeholders in your organisation as the basis for deciding what actions should be taken over the next couple of years as digital workplaces start to emerge. By the time they do it may be too late for you to respond  and (as Jane suggests)  the brightest and best employees will find somewhere else to work.</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/549/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forecasts for intranets, content technology, mobile, social media and IT for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/545</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/545#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the time of the year when consultants like to test themselves by forecasting what is going to happen in the year ahead. In this post I have brought together a personal selection of these forecasts on a range of intranet-related topics. Intranets What&#8217;s in store for the world of intranets in 2012  Paul Miller, Chief Executive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the time of the year when consultants like to test themselves by forecasting what is going to happen in the year ahead. In this post I have brought together a personal selection of these forecasts on a range of intranet-related topics.</p>
<p><strong>Intranets</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibforum.com/2011/12/14/whats-in-store-for-the-world-of-intranets-in-2012/" target="_blank">What&#8217;s in store for the world of intranets in 2012</a>  Paul Miller, Chief Executive of the Intranet Benchmarking Forum</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clearboxconsulting.co.uk/a-review-of-the-2011-in-intranets-and-the-digital-workplace/" target="_blank">A review of 2011 in intranets and the digital workplace</a>   Sam Marshall, Clearbox Consulting</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digital-workplace-trends.com/" target="_blank">Digital Workplace Trends</a>  Jane McConnell, NetJMC</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intrateam.com/gb/group/mytracker" target="_blank">Intranet predictions for 2012</a>  IntraTeam</p>
<p><strong>Technology</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2260-2012-Technology-Predictions.html" target="_blank">2012 Technology Predictions</a>  Real Story Group</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/information-management/gartner-10-predictions-for-2012-it-departments-to-adapt-or-be-swept-aside-013696.php" target="_blank">10 Predictions for 2012</a> Gartner Group</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Top-Tech-Predictions-for-Business/story.xhtml?story_id=0030003IYKPX&amp;full_skip=1" target="_blank">Top tech predictions for 2012 </a> Newsfactor</p>
<p><strong>Mobile</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.designcaffeine.com/articles/mobile-websites-tablet-apps-and-hybrids-7-mobile-strategy-tips-for-2012/" target="_blank">Mobile strategy tips for 2012</a>  Gred Nudelman</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/16-predictions-for-mobile-in-2012/" target="_blank">16 predictions for mobile in 2012</a>  Gigaom</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chetansharma.com/blog/2012/01/03/2012-mobile-industry-predictions-survey/" target="_blank">2012 mobile industry predictions survey</a> Chetan Sharma</p>
<p><strong>Social media</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/30-social-media-predictions-for-2012-from-the-pros/" target="_blank">30 social media projections for 2012</a>  Social Media Examiner</p>
<p><strong>Microsoft</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redmondmag.com/articles/2012/01/01/12-microsoft-hot-buttons-for-2012.aspx" target="_blank">12 Microsoft hot buttons for 2012 </a>Mary Jo Foley</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/545/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Very Short Introduction to Information</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/541</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/541#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am an information scientist by profession, and sufficiently proud of the fact to tell prospective clients at an initial meeting. The Wikipedia definition of information science is a good one, but the historical background is weak, and for example makes no reference to founding of the (UK) Institute of Information Scientists in 1958.  Information [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an information scientist by profession, and sufficiently proud of the fact to tell prospective clients at an initial meeting. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_science" target="_blank">Wikipedia definition of information science</a> is a good one, but the historical background is weak, and for example makes no reference to founding of the (UK) Institute of Information Scientists in 1958.  Information fascinates me, and yet my professional experience and learning over four decades enables me to see commonalities in how people find, assess, use and communicate information.</p>
<p>The literature of information science is vast, but is published in books and journals aimed at the academic market. There have been some attempts to ‘popularise’ information, notably (and in my view unsuccessfully) by <a href="http://around.com/" target="_blank">James Gleick</a>, but none of them get to the heart of matter.  Browsing around the vast subterranean <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Norrington_room.jpg" target="_blank">Norrington Room</a> of Blackwell’s in Oxford this week I can across a very small book entitled <a href="http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/nav/i/category/academic/series/general/vsi/9780199551378/R/browse+within+this+series/mathematics+%26+sciences/n/4294921802.do?sortby=bookTitleAscend" target="_blank">Information – A Very Short Introduction</a> by <a href="http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/Welcome.html" target="_blank">Luciano Floridi</a>. This is a remarkable book.  In just 126 pages of masterly exposition and insight the author introduces the reader to a vast panorama of information in action. The chapters cover the information revolution, the language of information, mathematical information, semantic information, physical information, biological information, economic information and the ethics of information.  In the intranet world we often see content and information as being synonyms, but that is far too simplistic.</p>
<p>Reading this book will not have an immediate impact on your intranet, but you will almost certainly see information in a different and probably more stimulating way.  I know many people who have had the same sort of epiphany when reading the books on the visual display of information by <a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/" target="_blank">Edward Tufte</a>.  Why not start 2012 by stretching your mind a little, and purchasing this little book?  It won&#8217;t take long to read.</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/541/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information management &#8211; a historical perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/515</link>
		<comments>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/515#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intranetfocus.com/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I would start the 2012 blog year by looking back, not just at 2011 but at some information issues that were emerging in 16th century Europe. One of the most fascinating books I read in 2011 was Too Much To Know by Anne Blair.  This very erudite book is all about the problems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I would start the 2012 blog year by looking back, not just at 2011 but at some information issues that were emerging in 16<sup>th</sup> century Europe. One of the most fascinating books I read in 2011 was <a href="http://yalepress.yale.edu/book.asp?isbn=9780300112511" target="_blank">Too Much To Know</a> by Anne Blair.  This very erudite book is all about the problems of managing scholarly information before in Modern Age.  We think that the problems of information overload are just a result of the digital revolution that has taken place over the last decade or so, but the reality is that every age has had the same types of problem to overcome. On p14 of her book the author has a major subtitle Information Management in Antiquity, and throughout the book the theme of information management keeps on appearing as new methods were invented to cope not just with advent of printed books but also with an overload of manuscripts.</p>
<p>What we refer to as information architecture dates back to 1503 where a branched contents page was used to help the reader understand how the manuscript was organised. The concept of the index dates from 1515, and at that time had to cope with the fact that manuscripts did not have page numbers. Instead a chapter was divided into sections, tagged from A through to whatever was a sensible letter . Writing marginal notes in manuscripts, very much along the lines of social tagging, started to be commonplace around 1570. All these were solutions to how to deal effectively with increasing amounts of information.</p>
<p>Even some of our current approaches to information management have a long history. The development of enterprise search can be traced back to the work of <a href="http://www.cs.cornell.edu/annual_report/1996/beginning/salton.html" target="_blank">Gerald Salton</a> in the mid-1960s and wikis were introduced by Ward Cunningham in 1994, about the same time as weblogs started to appear. No one has even owned up to coining the term ‘intranet’ though by 1996 there were certainly a number of intranet implementation case studies being published. I can still vividly remember the enthusiasm and indeed passion for intranets at Intranets 1999 in San Francisco. This was probably the first intranet-specific conference.</p>
<p>As we move in to 2012 it is likely that mobile access to information will be high up the list for evaluation and implementation, so it is worth remembering that the initial development work on cellular mobile devices took place in the mid-1970s and tablet PCs were launched (briefly!) in 2002.</p>
<p>As well as Ann Baker’s book there is also a good book on the historical development of information management from <a href="http://www.alexwright.org/glut/" target="_blank">Alex Wright</a>.</p>
<p>Is there a moral here for 2012? Probably that we should not be diverted from a path of delivering content excellence by unthinking adoption of &#8216;new&#8217; technology. An <a href="http://www.infotoday.com/online/nov02/white.htm" target="_blank">article that I had written in late 2002</a> on selecting a content management application was brought to my attention just before Christmas.  To my considerable surprise well over 90% is still relevant today. I&#8217;d like to think that was a result of my skills in forecasting the future but the reality is that industrial-strength technology takes a long time to move from vendor enthusiasm to wide-spread adoption.</p>
<p>Martin White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intranetfocus.com/archives/515/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

